Yesterday,  the MTA Board approved the two taxi  items on its agenda: an additional  40 cents on the flag drop, and 87 more  cabs.  As a result, a meter  increase bringing the flag drop to $3.50 and  the distance and waiting  time to 55 cents a click should go into effect around  the beginning of  September.  The new cabs will probably take longer,  especially if there  is an appeal to the Board of Appeals (which seems  likely).
The  cab decision was exactly as had  been proposed: 25 full-time medallions  to the list; 10 full-time medallions  to be sold directly by the MTA; a  trial program for 50 single-operator permits  (which could, however,  have two operators); and aqn experiment with 2  battery-switchable  electric vehicles.
Cab  companies were out in force opposing  the proposal for more cabs.  Not  that they were trying to save their  drivers from added competition --  quite the contrary.  Yellow, Luxor  and  DeSoto management have been pushing for 500 more cabs, with the  permits  going to companies rather than drivers.  They want to  kill  single-operator permits because they can't make money from  them, and  because the SOPs (?) stand in the way of the corporate  medallions  companies want. 
In  my mind, these part-time permits are far  preferable to full-time  medallions.  They'll be on the streets only about  1/3 the time, so they  won't be hurting drivers during the slowest  hours.  There are some  controversial aspects to the idea, however.   The permits are to go to  the most senior drivers in the industry, circumventing  the list.  The  hours of operation will be flexible, which will best serve  the public,  but enforcement may be a problem.  Retirement for permit  holders is an  open question.  And, most ominously, a monthly lease fee  will be  charged for the permits.  The fee can be reduced or  eliminated by  taking dispatched orders, but it sets a bad precedent, and  creates a  swamp of micro-regulation where the MTA is going to have to count  every  dispatch call these cabs take (or, more likely, rely on someone  else's  count).  Nonetheless, I still believe this is better than  hundreds of  full-time permits in company hands.  It's a trial program, so  if parts  of it turn out to be unfair or unworkable, they  could be changed.  And  if the whole idea turns out to be a bust, it will go  away.     
Also  ominous is the direct sale of 10  medallions by the MTA.  At $250,000  apiece, the agency will  pocket $2,375,000, with the balance of $125,000  going to the Driver  Fund. This is a brand new source of revenue for  the MTA.  Up to  now, the agency has directly sold only existing  medallions  returned to it after death or revocation.  In light of the  MTA's  chronic financial problems, these 10 new medallions are only a  hint  of what is likely to come -- unless we do something about it,  which we  must.  The MTA has a conflict of interest between its  regulatory duties and  its financial interests that cannot be allowed to  stand.             
Although  the hearing lasted over an hour, driver  turnout was not as robust as  at previous meetings.  It seemed that about  half the public speakers  were from cab companies.  Maybe fatigue has set  in.
The  vote of the Board approving the cab proposal  was 6-1.  The "no" vote  was cast by former Taxi Commissioner  Bruce Oka.  It appears the cab  companies convinced him to take  their side.
MTA staff did not discuss credit cards or  electronic waybills at the meeting.
Mark Gruberg
United Taxicab Workers
 
 
 
I'm impressed, I have to say. Actually hardly ever do I encounter a weblog that's equally educative and entertaining, and let me inform you, you may have strike the nail on the head. Your concept is outstanding the issue is one thing that not sufficient individuals are speaking intelligently about. I am very joyful that I stumbled throughout this in my find for anything referring to this.
ReplyDeleteunion city taxi